Last Wednesday after another edition of the newspaper you are now reading had been completed, my better half and I made embarked on our weekly ritual of going to lunch.
Working man ignored in tough times
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
#1
jdub
on
02/07/09 at 03:26 AM
[Reply]
How can Mr. Bridges sit and type this type of hypocritical nonsense. He urges us not to wave a party flag in a article completly bashing one particular party. He failed to mention that several democrats also failed to support the presidents stimulas package, and that the majority of the democrats that supported the package did so with the statement they would vote for anything the president proposed in order to show solidarity in the democrat party. And as Mr Bridges did err that four republicans did vote yes for the original package and only voted no after it was loaded with earmarks. He also fails to mention that this stimulas package is completly different than the first package passed last year. Last years package was passed with a specific purpose and time line for spending with no provisions for the companies using the money except that they would be expected to repay the money (which some are already doing). The new package focuses more on undesignated spending and earmark projects that will do nothing to stimulate the economy. More than 1 billion dollars is set to be spent on research for global warming, not exactly something that will create a boost in consumer spending and confidence. Also the president has marked a large portion of the money has been designated for future projects not yet in place over the next 24-48 months. Seems that Mr. Bridges was more intent on bashing the republican party and then expecting that the readers would suddenly abandon our less government is better government beliefs.

